The first image show a werewolf.I choice this one because i like wolf ,as well I like the way they took the image of the photo.The image is a shallow depth ,because the background is blury and it is aimed at the wolf more then the background .The lighting on the image is quite dark,but some of the light effect reflects of the fur and makes the character really outspoken. The emotion seem really sad or serious ,as the character looks like talking something serious. The captured looks like the character is talking to another character at that moment.
Link :http://harrypotter.wikia.com/wiki/Werewolf_army
The shot on the image more like rule of thirds with mix of shallow depth in the background.In the image it looks like harry putting a spell on the buckbeak or talking to buckbeak. I say the light bring image lots of depth and detail on this image, because it bring out the Buckbeak out ,as well part of harry detail ,as harry his kind in the dark and out of forces.The emotion brings surprise and some shocks ,because how beautiful the creature is and really outspoken on the buckbeak.The key point is the bond between creature and humans in this moment.The image capture the full set image and show you what is going off,
Link:http://www.booksatruestory.com/2014/02/07/lord-rings-marathon-day-2-trilogy/thestral/
I like this image,because it detail on the wings ,like bat weeks.I say the Iso on this image is 200 or 100,as the light kind of low and makes the creature unseeable.The emotion is like a darkness kind of feeling like sad or anger.The creature looks kind of a demon kind of monster,as the wing and the bone showen on the flesh makes it demon like.
I like the image because the light and darkness of the picture brings the owl stand out and very glowly image.The emotion is quite happy,as the owl looks kind of happy in the image.




Looking good Beth, well done. Hopefully this research has given you some ideas!
ReplyDeleteDon't forget to use a capital I and not a lowercase i. Watch for spaces between words. Good annotation though.
ReplyDelete